Welcome Guest,

» Why join TelecomTV?
» Become a Network Partner

Network Innovation

The Network Innovation Channel
TelecomTV's Network Innovation will chart the development of THE most important trends in telecoms & connected IT. Not just the technologies - Software Defined Networking, Network Functions Virtualisation, Big Data, Cloud and mobile & fixed broadband - but how they are being mashed together to construct new business models, new services, new capabilities. New sources of innovation.

Popular tags

3G 4G Alcatel-Lucent Android Apple apps AT&T Broadband Cisco cloud competition Comverse Devices Ericsson Facebook FCC Finance Google Green Greenplanet HP Internet iPhone IPTV ITU Juniper legislation LTE M2M Microsoft mobile MobileBroadband MobileWorldCongress network networks Nokia Regulation Research Samsung Services Smartphones Technology Telcordia telcos TIA Verizon Video Vodafone WiFi Wireless

Go to Search

Roy Mira's Profile

Networking Manager
Verizon Wireless
United States

Joined: Over 6 months
Last online: 4 months ago

» Send Message

» Invite to Join group

» Invite to Event

About Roy Mira

Coming soon.

Roy Mira's Posts

Comments

" According to your old Oxford dictionary, evil is actually what you’ve spewed out in this article. Consumed as you are by envy and hatred for the class of producers, your obsession with the 19th century Manifesto continues to blind you on how economic growth is obtained by societies, and to narrow down your vision range to the simple minded, single tone redistribution theme. Grow up to understand the economic realities of today and the challenges of optimizing ever more complex products as well as corporate performance to continue to sustain the classes of consumers, as your media class. And if as you say, Google didn’t do anything illegal, then you’ve lost a good opportunity to remain silent, didn’t you? " In Google “can make money without doing evil” (as it evades $2bn in taxes) 6 months ago by Roy Mira
" Hard to see how Americans are trying to stop the penetration of Chinese made equipment in our telecommunications systems solely to protect our own companies business, when in fact, America has gladly given away almost its entire economy to them commies in so many other areas without any fuss about it. " In Matt Bross, CTO of Huawei North America resigns. Another case of "Americans being Americans"? Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" Data traffic leaving an OTT site over its pipe to the Operator, can, through typical global addressing, streaming setups, bit torrent and other Internet technologies, multiply itself and literally explode into data storms so as to clog the operator’s net and impact other Internet users of other services, all of this well away from the OTT initial output pipe. Who’s to pay for the Operator network expansion needed to preserve the quality of all its services, and negatively affected by this new data paradigm introduced by the OTT's? Certainly not the consumers who don’t use the OTT. So, should it be, (a)the customers of the OTT service (by paying higher access rates to the Operator?!...) , or (b) the OTT provider , or (c) the Operator itself, which now has to gracefully eat the expansion cost as charity to the OTT? " In Why a 'sender pays' Internet would be utterly wrong Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" “… We can guess immediately who would be responsible for the cost of installing the equipment to track downloads so that an estimate of who should get the money can be determined - ISPs….” Hummm…. Interesting! Let’s see how this works from the left angle. A bunch of thieves hide stolen goods in scattered warehouses, from which they FEDEX them to “fences” all over the place. Don’t bother in trying to stop and punish thieves and fences, after all, it must be just the rich being robbed. Instead, let’s develop an advanced detection and tracking system built into the FEDEX delivery, and when a “hot” item delivery is detected we just force FEDEX to pay the item value to the theft victim. And who, of course, can we guess immediately should be responsible for the cost of this new system? FEDEX of course ! " In Has Hadopi had it now that Hollande is here? Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" Up front QOS information that is transparent, accurate, clear, and all that, is quite fair. Totally agreed. But if this is all about forcing Operators to provide OTT's, VOIP, public users, etc, with massive IP bandwidth at the same QOS of the Operator's "individual clients with special services", but with none of the special tariffs, contracts or business exechanges that went on with said clients and accounted for that higher QOS cost, then the members of your "BODY-EREC" over there may be having a little wet dream on their on... This may come as a shock in this day and age of social regulation galore, but something that has been consumed, was either given to, or should have been paid for by whoever consumed it. If not, somebody else (usually unrelated to the matter) will end up paying for it. That does not contribute to society growth, it never has. " In In the hands of the stranglers Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" "France's incumbent mobile operators hate their pushy upstart competitor 'Free Mobile' with a deep and bitter passion..." . Come on, Martyn, it's all about money, and at that high Corporate level it's all ice cold mathematical maneuvering. You wanna see hate with deep and bitter passion ? Look no further than your mirror. " In Free: The hungry French cat amongst the overfed pigeons Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" Oh dear Martyn, you're walking a thin line between your inate hatred of Authority and Corporations. There is certainly enough of it in your belly to swing you back pretty soon against Authority again. Fact is, S&P was a slime ball then, in 2007/2008, when it blessed tranches of mortgages given to deadbeats by pressure from these sources: a- lender's greed, b- its own greed, and last but not least, c- the US government, which blackmailed lenders to give away loans to deadbeats, or else get sued for discrimination. What did you expect lenders to do? Under duress, they did what finance operatives are supposed to do, securitize and resell the smelly paper to spread the risk. Sorry, investors in the US and all over the world !... S&P should have been punished and crushed THEN, for not alerting the securities buyers, not NOW when it correctly downgraded a demagogue government that overtly will not cut its alarming expenditures while facing a ballooning debt that cannot be paid by even over taxing the wealthy to death (which of course would dry out the overall revenues anyway). No, I'm not a banker, or with a Credit Rating company, I'm just an electrical engineer employed with an American Telecom. I often enjoy your articles though, and your prose style, they're often amusing, so keep them coming. Excuse me? Oh, the ideas on them?... Well, let's not worry about them, but your style is very good though! That's what you are in it for, right ? " In Sharma's karma. Did S&P's president walk or was he pushed? Over 6 months by Roy Mira
" ... then you build it, you pay for it, you own it, and the market sets its price and usage... NOT regulators ! Oh, yes, innovation often comes from small guys, but only because they want to become (and do become) the johnny-come-lately / greedy / filled with hubris /angry monopolies wanting to have full reign over every aspect of what they've built and paid for. Of course a competitive environment is essential for a vibrant economy. But Regulation has been doing a great job in stagnating it. Some of your points are well taken, but if you imply that the incubent should invest, build, pay and share for "a fair price", who's to set that fair price? Regulators? If you say YES, then the incubent will not build... If you say the MARKET, then the little guys will be excluded by default... Are you sure you guys thought this well through. Oh I see, you don't mean a free market, you mean a central planning for the means of production, gotch ya!... " In Can't share. Won't share. Bell Canada has hissy fit Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" According to your old Oxford dictionary, evil is actually what you’ve spewed out in this article. Consumed as you are by envy and hatred for the class of producers, your obsession with the 19th century Manifesto continues to blind you on how economic growth is obtained by societies, and to narrow down your vision range to the simple minded, single tone redistribution theme. Grow up to understand the economic realities of today and the challenges of optimizing ever more complex products as well as corporate performance to continue to sustain the classes of consumers, as your media class. And if as you say, Google didn’t do anything illegal, then you’ve lost a good opportunity to remain silent, didn’t you? "

In Google “can make money without doing evil” (as it evades $2bn in taxes) 6 months ago by Roy Mira

" Hard to see how Americans are trying to stop the penetration of Chinese made equipment in our telecommunications systems solely to protect our own companies business, when in fact, America has gladly given away almost its entire economy to them commies in so many other areas without any fuss about it. "

In Matt Bross, CTO of Huawei North America resigns. Another case of "Americans being Americans"? Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" Data traffic leaving an OTT site over its pipe to the Operator, can, through typical global addressing, streaming setups, bit torrent and other Internet technologies, multiply itself and literally explode into data storms so as to clog the operator’s net and impact other Internet users of other services, all of this well away from the OTT initial output pipe. Who’s to pay for the Operator network expansion needed to preserve the quality of all its services, and negatively affected by this new data paradigm introduced by the OTT's? Certainly not the consumers who don’t use the OTT. So, should it be, (a)the customers of the OTT service (by paying higher access rates to the Operator?!...) , or (b) the OTT provider , or (c) the Operator itself, which now has to gracefully eat the expansion cost as charity to the OTT? "

In Why a 'sender pays' Internet would be utterly wrong Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" “… We can guess immediately who would be responsible for the cost of installing the equipment to track downloads so that an estimate of who should get the money can be determined - ISPs….” Hummm…. Interesting! Let’s see how this works from the left angle. A bunch of thieves hide stolen goods in scattered warehouses, from which they FEDEX them to “fences” all over the place. Don’t bother in trying to stop and punish thieves and fences, after all, it must be just the rich being robbed. Instead, let’s develop an advanced detection and tracking system built into the FEDEX delivery, and when a “hot” item delivery is detected we just force FEDEX to pay the item value to the theft victim. And who, of course, can we guess immediately should be responsible for the cost of this new system? FEDEX of course ! "

In Has Hadopi had it now that Hollande is here? Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" Up front QOS information that is transparent, accurate, clear, and all that, is quite fair. Totally agreed. But if this is all about forcing Operators to provide OTT's, VOIP, public users, etc, with massive IP bandwidth at the same QOS of the Operator's "individual clients with special services", but with none of the special tariffs, contracts or business exechanges that went on with said clients and accounted for that higher QOS cost, then the members of your "BODY-EREC" over there may be having a little wet dream on their on... This may come as a shock in this day and age of social regulation galore, but something that has been consumed, was either given to, or should have been paid for by whoever consumed it. If not, somebody else (usually unrelated to the matter) will end up paying for it. That does not contribute to society growth, it never has. "

In In the hands of the stranglers Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" "France's incumbent mobile operators hate their pushy upstart competitor 'Free Mobile' with a deep and bitter passion..." . Come on, Martyn, it's all about money, and at that high Corporate level it's all ice cold mathematical maneuvering. You wanna see hate with deep and bitter passion ? Look no further than your mirror. "

In Free: The hungry French cat amongst the overfed pigeons Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" Oh dear Martyn, you're walking a thin line between your inate hatred of Authority and Corporations. There is certainly enough of it in your belly to swing you back pretty soon against Authority again. Fact is, S&P was a slime ball then, in 2007/2008, when it blessed tranches of mortgages given to deadbeats by pressure from these sources: a- lender's greed, b- its own greed, and last but not least, c- the US government, which blackmailed lenders to give away loans to deadbeats, or else get sued for discrimination. What did you expect lenders to do? Under duress, they did what finance operatives are supposed to do, securitize and resell the smelly paper to spread the risk. Sorry, investors in the US and all over the world !... S&P should have been punished and crushed THEN, for not alerting the securities buyers, not NOW when it correctly downgraded a demagogue government that overtly will not cut its alarming expenditures while facing a ballooning debt that cannot be paid by even over taxing the wealthy to death (which of course would dry out the overall revenues anyway). No, I'm not a banker, or with a Credit Rating company, I'm just an electrical engineer employed with an American Telecom. I often enjoy your articles though, and your prose style, they're often amusing, so keep them coming. Excuse me? Oh, the ideas on them?... Well, let's not worry about them, but your style is very good though! That's what you are in it for, right ? "

In Sharma's karma. Did S&P's president walk or was he pushed? Over 6 months by Roy Mira

" ... then you build it, you pay for it, you own it, and the market sets its price and usage... NOT regulators ! Oh, yes, innovation often comes from small guys, but only because they want to become (and do become) the johnny-come-lately / greedy / filled with hubris /angry monopolies wanting to have full reign over every aspect of what they've built and paid for. Of course a competitive environment is essential for a vibrant economy. But Regulation has been doing a great job in stagnating it. Some of your points are well taken, but if you imply that the incubent should invest, build, pay and share for "a fair price", who's to set that fair price? Regulators? If you say YES, then the incubent will not build... If you say the MARKET, then the little guys will be excluded by default... Are you sure you guys thought this well through. Oh I see, you don't mean a free market, you mean a central planning for the means of production, gotch ya!... "

In Can't share. Won't share. Bell Canada has hissy fit Over 6 months by Roy Mira

» TelecomTV One	» Latest Videos	» Viewing TelecomTV Now
» Search	» Latest Events	» Register
» Channels	» Tag Cloud	» Sign out
» Video Playlists	» NewsDesk	» Sign in

» Cerillion	» Microsoft
» Green Planet	» Qosmos
» HP	» TIA